Kkula
Browse Questions » Safety Evaluation Tool: Sil / Pf Height Located At Atex Zon 1

About User

Questions Asked: 37.9K

Answers Given: 32

0
  • Open

Safety Evaluation Tool: Sil / Pf Height Located At Atex Zon 1

Hey I have a question regarding how to arrive the SIL / PF level to use.
When i look in the Safety Evalution Tool there is a help that talks about missing arm or death.
But if there is Atex Zon 1 in a gas plant.
Exemple:
I have a on/off valve and apressure transmitter that is controlled by a PLC
First, the operator shall attach a bottle to the facility
Then the operator use a HMI to start the automatic filling.
open the valve control system
if the pressure increases, so everything is ok
if the pressure drops, it is a leak, the valve will close
What is the risk here?
Is there any need of safety I/O?
Do the pressure transmitter need to be safety?

0 Likes 0 Favourites 0 Followers 0 Comments
Answers(1)
SIL/PF Level Determination for Gas Plant Application

SIL/PF Level Determination

Determining the appropriate Safety Integrity Level (SIL) or Performance Factor (PF) requires a thorough risk assessment. The Safety Evaluation Tool's guidance on "missing arm or death" is a starting point, but needs context.

Risk Assessment for Your Application

Your scenario involves a gas plant with an ATEX Zone 1 classification, a filling process controlled by a PLC, an on/off valve, and a pressure transmitter. The primary risk is a gas leak due to valve failure or pressure transmitter malfunction. This could lead to a flammable atmosphere and potential ignition.

Risk Factors to Consider:

  • Gas Toxicity: The specific gas being handled impacts severity.
  • Leak Rate: How quickly could a leak develop and reach a dangerous concentration?
  • Ignition Sources: ATEX Zone 1 implies potential ignition sources are present.
  • Consequence of Failure: Potential for fire, explosion, personnel injury, environmental damage.

SIL/PF Determination & Safety Measures

Given the ATEX Zone 1 environment, a risk assessment should likely lead to a SIL 2 or 3 requirement (or equivalent PF level). Here's a breakdown of considerations:

  • Safety I/O: Highly recommended. Safety I/O provides a hardware-based safety layer independent of the PLC, ensuring the valve closes even if the PLC fails.
  • Pressure Transmitter: A safety-rated pressure transmitter is crucial. It serves as the primary safety function detecting a leak and initiating valve closure. Consider a SIL 2 or 3 rated transmitter depending on the risk assessment outcome.
  • Valve: The valve should be fail-safe (closes upon loss of power or signal). A certified valve for the appropriate gas group and temperature class is essential.
  • PLC: The PLC needs to be appropriately specified and programmed to handle safety functions if relied upon, but should not be the *sole* safety element.

Resources

For detailed guidance and tools:

Disclaimer: This information is for general guidance only. A formal risk assessment performed by qualified personnel is essential to determine the appropriate SIL/PF level for your specific application.

0