Kkula
Dear all,
Context:
We use Profinet communication.
I have 1
S7-1500
as data concentrator to populate a Rack-PC supervisor
WinCC
.(connected with PN)
The
S7-1500
retrieves
20 DWords
from all the
30 S7-1200
on the field to update
WinCC
.
The
S7-1500
also sends
2 DWords
to all the
30 S7-1200
on the field from
WinCC
.
All 30 S7-1200 have their own electrical panel and do their own process.
Note
:
We use DWords to save communication bandwidth between S7-1500 and S7-1200.
Also we use DWords to save Powertags between S7-1500 and Rack-PC supervisor WinCC
DWords contain statuses, faults, memories... (not only DI / DO)
Question:
As we need to send a lot of information bits between S7-1200 PLCs and the S7-1500, I suppose that IODevice exchange is not a good choice.Better to send / receive DWords ?
So do we need to avoid to configure our 30 S7-1200 PLCs as IODevice ?
Or to configure them (S7-1200) as IODevice doesn't affect SEND_C / RECEIVE_C communication ? What is more preferable ?
Is there a native way more suitable to exchange those DWords (contained inside external DBs of each S7-1200) ?
Thanks in advance,
David
Our flexible community website is a platform that allows users to connect, share information, and collaborate on various topics of interest. The website offers a range of features such as discussion forums, messaging, user profiles, event calendars, and more. Users can customize their experience by creating and joining different groups or communities based on their interests or location. The website is designed to be user-friendly and adaptable to the needs and preferences of our diverse user base. Whether you are looking to network professionally, share hobbies and interests, or simply connect with like-minded individuals, our flexible community website has something for everyone. Join us today and become a part of our thriving online community!
India
Copyright ©2026
Share this page with your family and friends.